ADVERTISEMENT

Bitcoin at $76,000: What the Midterm Selloff Really Means

Bitcoin coin

Photo: Pexels

Bitcoin spent the first week of November doing something it has done many times before: it gave traders a reason to celebrate, then took the money back within a day. On Wednesday, November 4, the price pushed above $80,000 as the US midterm results came in. By Thursday night it was trading near $75,600, and on Friday morning it was fighting to hold $76,000. The swing was violent, but it was not random. It was the collision of three forces that have been building for months: a political shock to the artificial intelligence trade, an ETF market that now decides Bitcoin's daily direction, and a leverage system that turns every sharp move into a bigger one.

This article explains what happened, why $76,000 matters more than it looks, and what to watch in the days ahead. Prices quoted here are snapshots from named sources at named times, because Bitcoin trades around the clock on dozens of exchanges and no single number tells the whole story.

The whiplash week: $80,000 to $76,000 in a day

The week started quietly. Bitcoin closed on Tuesday, November 3, at $77,406, still working off the damage from the $6.3 billion Binance hack the previous weekend. Then the midterm results arrived. Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress, taking 54 Senate seats with two races still uncalled, and markets first read the result as good news for crypto: an end to the Iran conflict looked closer, oil prices fell, and risk appetite returned. Bitcoin rose 5.7 percent to about $80,484 during Asian trading on Thursday, according to CoinDesk and CoinGecko data. Zcash led the wider market, jumping 11.7 percent to about $1,318 ahead of its NU7 network upgrade.

The celebration lasted hours. By Thursday's US session, the Nasdaq Composite had fallen 5.5 percent to about 24,315, its deepest one-day drop in 19 months and enough to confirm a technical correction, a 10 percent fall from its October 6 record close. The S&P 500 dropped 4.3 percent and the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1,833 points, or 3.44 percent. Bitcoin fell with them, closing November 5 at $75,594 according to Yahoo Finance, with an intraday low near $74,781. On Friday morning it traded around $75,849 to $76,024 before clawing back above $76,000. The CoinDesk 20 index, which tracks the wider crypto market, fell 6.28 percent in the same 24 hours. Ethereum dropped more than 7 percent to about $2,247.

Put in context, Bitcoin is now roughly 38 percent below its all-time high of $126,156, set on October 6, 2025. The Fear and Greed index sat at 32, firmly in fear territory. Friday brought a partial rebound in chip stocks, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rising 4.21 percent and the Nasdaq gaining 1.09 percent, but the Dow still fell about 237 points. The damage was done.

What actually happened on Thursday

Three numbers describe Thursday better than any headline. First, US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $430.2 million in net outflows, according to SoSoValue data reported by CoinDesk. Fidelity's FBTC led with $199.9 million out, followed by BlackRock's IBIT at $105 million. That reversed Wednesday's post-election inflows in a single session. Second, crypto liquidations reached $1.24 to $1.26 billion over 24 hours, according to CoinGlass, with about $325 million of that in Bitcoin and roughly 90 percent of it long positions, bets that prices would rise. In one four-hour window alone, about $880 million was liquidated, 93 percent of it longs. Third, global stocks wiped out $3.2 to $3.5 trillion in value, with the Nasdaq 100 alone shedding $2.3 trillion in its largest drop on record, according to figures reported by The Guardian. Asia followed overnight: South Korea's KOSPI fell 6.7 percent, Japan's Nikkei slumped nearly 6 percent, and Taiwan's Taiex dropped 4.5 percent.

None of this happened because of anything Bitcoin did. Bitcoin fell because it is now treated by large investors as a high-beta technology asset, and technology was the epicentre of the selloff.

Driver one: the midterm result changed the AI story

The first driver was political, and it worked through the AI trade. For most of 2026, the market's biggest bet has been that artificial intelligence infrastructure spending would keep growing almost without limit. Data centres, chips, power contracts, and the miners who pivoted into hosting AI workloads all rode that bet. The Democratic midterm sweep put a question mark over it. Analysts at FalconX and GSR linked the selloff to concerns that the new majorities, who take office on January 3, could slow AI data-centre construction and tighten regulation of the sector.

The sharpest version of that fear is in Texas. Democrat Gina Hinojosa unseated Governor Greg Abbott after pledging to halt all data-centre approvals until the legislature passes new protections, and Wells Fargo estimates that 27 percent of planned data-centre capacity in the United States sits in Texas. A national data-centre moratorium bill introduced in March by Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, which would halt even work already under way, has only 22 members of Congress signed on, but the Texas result made the idea look less theoretical than it did a week ago. Chip makers led the decline: Micron and AMD each lost about 17 percent, and Nvidia dropped more than 9 percent.

SoftBank, the most leveraged name in the AI buildout, told the same story from the credit side. Its shares fell 11 percent on November 6, while the cost of insuring its debt against default rose to a four-year high. When the market starts pricing default risk on the biggest funder of the AI boom, every asset priced as part of that boom feels it, and Bitcoin is now priced as part of it.

Driver two: ETF money walked out the door

The second driver is structural, and it is the most important change in Bitcoin's market since the spot ETFs launched in January 2024. Bitcoin is no longer mainly a retail market. It is a flow-driven macro asset, and the flows now come through ETFs. When ETF buyers pull $430 million in a day, the price feels it immediately, because there is no central bank or corporate buyer stepping in to absorb the selling.

The pattern of the week shows how mechanical this has become. ETF flows were positive on Wednesday, November 4, with $74.6 million of inflows after three straight sessions of withdrawals, and Bitcoin rose. On Thursday the flows flipped to $430.2 million of outflows, and Bitcoin fell more than 5 percent. The same week, the second quarter of 2026 had already set the record for ETF redemptions, $4.67 billion, the largest quarterly outflow since the products launched. Glassnode counted 6.7 million Bitcoin held across ETFs, exchanges and treasuries at the end of 2025, roughly a third of the circulating supply. That concentration is what makes the ETF channel so powerful: a small percentage of holders changing their minds moves the whole market.

There is a second, quieter point here. The Binance hack is still draining confidence. The FBI attributed the $6.3 billion theft to North Korea's TraderTraitor group, the same group behind the $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February 2025, and customers had withdrawn a net $4.72 billion from Binance since withdrawals reopened on November 1, according to CoinDesk. A market already nervous about custody does not need much encouragement to sell.

Driver three: $1.26 billion of liquidations did the rest

The third driver is leverage, and it explains why the fall was so fast. When Bitcoin dropped through $80,000 and then $78,000, leveraged long positions started closing automatically. CoinGlass recorded $1.24 billion in liquidations over 24 hours, and about $1.10 billion of that, 88.6 percent, was long positions. Each forced sale pushed the price lower, which triggered the next round of forced sales. That cascade is why a 5 percent move in the Nasdaq turned into a 6 percent move in Bitcoin and a 7 percent move in Ethereum within hours.

Liquidations are not the same as selling by conviction. They are the market's margin-call machinery, and they exaggerate every move in both directions. The same machinery worked in reverse on Wednesday, when short covering, traders closing losing bets against Bitcoin, helped push the price above $80,000. Understanding this matters because it separates the signal from the noise: the liquidation cascade tells you how leveraged the market was, not where Bitcoin's fair value sits.

Why $76,000 is not just a round number

The level Bitcoin is defending now is more than a psychological line. According to Glassnode data analysed by Mitrade, $76,000 is close to the average cost basis of short-term holders, the investors who bought most recently. The short-term holder market-value-to-realised-value ratio sits near 1.02, meaning recent buyers are about 2 percent in profit. When the price sits at the average price recent buyers paid, every further fall puts a large group of holders underwater at the same time, and underwater holders sell.

The technical picture points the same way. Bitcoin is testing its bull-market support band, which combines the 21-week exponential moving average at $76,874 and the 20-week simple moving average at $73,779. It is holding the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement at $77,876, for now. Resistance sits at $81,000 to $82,000, where the price was rejected this week, with a stronger supply zone between $85,000 and $87,000. The weekly relative strength index reads 52, neutral, leaning slightly lower. Wintermute, the trading firm, identified $73,000 and $68,000 as the next levels to watch if weakness continues, and said Bitcoin would need to reclaim and hold $80,000 convincingly before it turns more positive. A breakdown below $73,000 to $74,000 could extend the slide towards $71,000, and a repeat of the May pattern would put $60,000 in play.

None of those levels are predictions. They are the lines where other traders have placed their orders, and markets respect lines like that until they do not. What matters is the structure: Bitcoin is balanced on the exact price where its newest buyers break even. That is a fragile place to sit.

The miners who became AI landlords

One corner of the selloff deserves its own mention, because it shows how tangled Bitcoin has become with the AI trade. Several Bitcoin miners spent 2026 pivoting into AI data centres, renting out their power contracts and cooling infrastructure to AI companies. On Thursday those miners were among the hardest hit stocks in the market. Bitdeer and Keel Infrastructure each fell about 20 percent, and American Bitcoin dropped 17 percent even after reporting a $126 million quarterly profit. The market was not punishing their mining business. It was repricing their AI landlord business, on the same Texas moratorium fears that hit the chip makers.

This is a strange position for Bitcoin miners to be in. Their share prices now fall when the AI trade falls, even when Bitcoin itself is the asset they mine. It is one more way the crypto market and the AI market have fused, and it is one more reason Bitcoin now moves with the Nasdaq instead of against it.

What this tells us about Bitcoin in late 2026

Three conclusions are worth drawing, and each of them is about structure rather than price. First, Bitcoin's identity has changed, and the market has not fully caught up with what that means. It spent its first decade being sold as digital gold, an asset that rises when everything else falls. In November 2026 it did the opposite: it fell harder than the stock market on a day the stock market fell. That is not a failure of Bitcoin. It is the consequence of who owns it now. ETF holders, trading firms and leveraged funds own the marginal Bitcoin, and they sell it the way they sell any other risk asset when fear arrives. The safe-haven story will return only if a different kind of buyer returns with it.

Second, the midterm result did not change Bitcoin's fundamentals, but it changed the price of the story that was holding up the whole risk complex. For two years the AI buildout justified valuations across chips, power, data centres and crypto-adjacent stocks. The election introduced a genuine question about whether that buildout continues at the same speed, and markets repriced everything attached to it at once. Bitcoin's fall was collateral damage from a repricing that started in semiconductors. That is a healthier explanation than a crypto-specific panic, but it is also a warning: as long as Bitcoin trades with the AI complex, an AI scare is a Bitcoin scare.

Third, the $76,000 level is a test of the market's memory. Bitcoin has now tested the short-term holder cost basis, the bull-market support band and the post-Binance-hack lows all at roughly the same price. If it holds, the story becomes one of a market that absorbed a $1.26 billion liquidation cascade, a $430 million ETF outflow and a 5.5 percent Nasdaq fall without breaking its structure. If it fails, the next stops are visible and mechanical, $73,000, then $71,000, then $68,000, and the conversation shifts from correction to something longer. Either way, the answer will come from flows, not from headlines: ETF inflows or outflows, and whether the buyers who stepped in near $75,700 on Wednesday are still willing to step in again.

What to watch next

Five things will decide where Bitcoin goes from here. The first is ETF flows over the next three sessions: a second day of heavy outflows would confirm that institutions are reducing exposure rather than rebalancing. The second is the Nasdaq's next move, and specifically whether chip stocks stabilise after Friday's rebound, when the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 4.21 percent. The third is the October jobs report, which showed 165,000 new jobs and unemployment down to 4.1 percent, strengthening bets on a Federal Reserve rate rise in December, with the Fed funds rate already at 3.75 to 4 percent after September's hike. A December rise would keep pressure on every risk asset. The fourth is Zcash's NU7 upgrade, expected around Friday, which is the one corner of the market showing independent strength. And the fifth is the Texas data-centre story: any concrete move on approvals, or any response from Washington, will tell the market whether the moratorium fear was a one-day scare or a real policy shift.

Bitcoin has survived worse weeks than this one. It has also, more than once, treated a week like this one as the start of something longer. The difference this time is that the evidence is visible in real time: ETF flows, liquidation data and the cost basis of recent buyers are all public. Watch those, and the price will make sense when it moves.

Frequently asked questions

Why did Bitcoin fall below $76,000?

Bitcoin fell with the wider market after the US midterm results raised fears of tighter AI regulation and slower data-centre construction. The Nasdaq dropped 5.5 percent, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $430.2 million in outflows, and $1.24 billion in leveraged positions was liquidated, which pushed the price down faster than the selling alone would have done.

Is $76,000 an important level for Bitcoin?

Yes. Glassnode data puts the average cost basis of short-term holders near $76,000, so it is the price where the newest buyers break even. It also sits inside Bitcoin's bull-market support band, between the 21-week exponential moving average at $76,874 and the 20-week simple moving average at $73,779. Losing it would expose $73,000 to $74,000, and then $71,000.

What caused the $430 million in Bitcoin ETF outflows?

Investors pulled money from spot Bitcoin ETFs during Thursday's tech selloff, led by Fidelity's FBTC with $199.9 million and BlackRock's IBIT with $105 million, according to SoSoValue. The outflows reversed Wednesday's post-election inflows and show that ETF holders now treat Bitcoin as a risk asset to sell when equities fall.

Why does Bitcoin fall when the Nasdaq falls?

Because the marginal buyers of Bitcoin are now institutions, ETF holders and trading firms who hold it alongside technology stocks. When those investors reduce risk, they sell both. Bitcoin miners that pivoted into AI data centres make the link even tighter, since their shares now move with the AI trade as well.

Will Bitcoin recover to $80,000?

It would need to reclaim and hold $80,000 convincingly, according to Wintermute, and resistance sits at $81,000 to $82,000 with a stronger supply zone at $85,000 to $87,000. Whether that happens depends mainly on ETF flows turning positive again and on chip stocks stabilising after the midterm selloff.

Is this a good time to buy Bitcoin?

That depends on your time horizon and risk tolerance, and this article is not financial advice. What the data shows is a market balanced on its short-term holders' break-even price, with fear high and leverage already flushed out by $1.26 billion in liquidations. Some traders see that as an opportunity; others wait for ETF flows to turn before committing.

Sources

  • CoinDesk — "Bitcoin recovers $76,000 level as ETFs shed $430 million after tech rout" (November 6, 2026): coindesk.com
  • CoinDesk — "Bitcoin holds above $80,000 as Zcash jumps 12% in post-election crypto rebound" (November 5, 2026): coindesk.com
  • Mitrade — "Bitcoin Price Outlook For November 2026: One Price Level Remains Critical" (November 3, 2026): mitrade.com
  • Phemex — "Why Did Bitcoin Drop? BTC and Liquidations on Nov. 6, 2026": phemex.com
  • Tech Times — "Bitcoin Drops Below $76,000: Texas Data Center Moratorium Fears Sink Miners Pivoting to AI" (November 6, 2026): techtimes.com
  • Market Briefer — "Crypto Pulse: November 6, 2026 — Bitcoin ETFs Shed $430 Million as Board Steadies After the Rout": marketbriefer.com
  • CoinJuice — "What Happened in Bitcoin Today: Custody Doubts & a Blue Congress" (November 4, 2026): coinjuice.com
  • The Guardian, via SuMarket — global stocks lose $3.2 trillion after Democratic midterm wins: sumarket.info
  • Instagram — market-roundup carousel documenting the November 5 selloff (Bitcoin $75,825.38, S&P 500, Nvidia, Tesla): instagram.com/p/DfYD_mkH08S

For more on markets, crypto and the global economy, visit abdulrahimmughal.com.

Post a Comment

Thanks for comment

Previous Post Next Post