Photo: Pexels
On Wednesday, October 28, the United States Federal Reserve will announce one of the most closely watched interest-rate decisions of the year. The meeting itself runs October 27–28, and the decision lands at 2 p.m. Eastern Time. On paper, the outcome looks settled: futures markets tracked by the CME FedWatch tool put the chance of the Fed holding its benchmark rate steady at roughly nine in ten, with only about one in ten pricing a quarter-point increase. The federal funds range currently stands at 3.75% to 4.00%, set at the September 15–16 meeting, the first increase since 2023.
That calm surface is misleading. Almost everything the Fed is supposed to react to is moving in the wrong direction at the same time. Oil is trading near $115 a barrel. American consumer prices rose 3.7% in the year to September, up from 3.4% in August. Hiring has weakened sharply, with September payrolls rising by just 29,000. And a trade framework between the world's two largest economies, agreed in Kuala Lumpur over the weekend, still needs the signatures of two presidents who have not yet met to approve it. The Fed is not deciding in a vacuum. It is deciding in the middle of a week when markets, energy prices and geopolitics are all pulling in different directions.
This article explains what the Fed will actually decide, why $115 oil changes the calculation, what the US-China framework does and does not solve, and what three possible outcomes would mean for borrowers, savers, investors and small businesses. The numbers here are as reported on Monday morning, October 26, and they will move. The logic behind them will not.
What the Fed actually decides on Wednesday
The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed's rate-setting body, sets the target range for the federal funds rate: the rate banks charge each other overnight. That one number ripples outward into mortgage rates, car loans, credit-card interest, corporate borrowing costs and the value of the dollar. When the Fed raises rates, borrowing gets more expensive and spending cools. When it holds, it is saying the current level is doing enough work for now.
The case for holding is straightforward. The September jobs report was weak: 29,000 new payrolls against expectations near 84,000 to 90,000, with unemployment ticking up to 4.2%. A central bank that tightens into a weakening labour market risks turning a slowdown into something worse. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has also made a point of refusing to guide markets in advance — "I'm not in the forward guidance business," he said in September — which means Wednesday's statement and any press remarks will be read line by line for hints about December.
The case for hiking is the inflation data. Consumer prices rose 0.6% in September alone, and 3.7% over twelve months. Gasoline did most of the damage, jumping 9.1% in a single month and 34.2% over the year, with energy overall up 20.4%. Strip out food and energy, and "core" inflation was 2.6% over the year, up from 2.4% in August but far below the headline figure. That gap is the whole argument in one number: if fuel prices are a passing shock, the Fed can wait; if they bleed into rents, wages and services, waiting becomes the mistake. The Fed's own target is 2% inflation, and 3.7% is not close to it.
Markets have already made their bet. As of October 25, CME FedWatch-based summaries put the hold probability at about 89.7%, and one weekly market summary put it at 90%. A UBS note published October 19 also took an unchanged October rate as its base case, while noting that markets were pricing a more aggressive tightening path further out than the bank itself expected. In other words, traders are not really debating Wednesday. They are debating December.
Why oil at $115 changes the calculation
Brent crude, the global benchmark, settled at $116.72 a barrel on Friday, its highest since late April, and was still trading near $115 on Monday morning, with US West Texas Intermediate around $101 to $102. That is not a normal energy market. It is a market pricing in a war premium: the risk that supply is disrupted, not just the fact that it already has been.
Three things pushed prices there. First, the war in the Middle East intensified around Saudi oil infrastructure, with Houthi attacks raising fears about shipments through the region. Second, the United States sanctioned Russia's two largest oil producers, Rosneft and Lukoil, and state-owned refiners in China and India — which together had been buying roughly 90% of Russia's seaborne crude exports in October, about 3 million barrels a day — began halting or cutting purchases to avoid those sanctions. Companies named in reports included PetroChina, Sinopec and India's Reliance. Third, the calendar: Friday's Wall Street sell-off, in which the Dow Jones fell 652.82 points (1.23%), the S&P 500 fell 0.52% and the Nasdaq slipped 0.21%, showed investors selling risk assets and moving toward the dollar and bonds at the same time.
For the Fed, expensive oil is a trap. Higher petrol prices push headline inflation up, which argues for higher rates. But they also act like a tax on every household and business that buys fuel, which slows spending and argues for patience. The September data shows both effects at once: headline inflation jumped because of petrol, while hiring slowed. A rate rise cannot produce more oil. It can only make borrowing more expensive while households are already paying more at the pump. That is why most analysts expect a hold even though inflation is above target: the Fed wants to know whether this oil spike fades before it adds to the pain.
There is a longer shadow here too. The International Monetary Fund's October outlook, titled "Resilience Under Strain, Urgent Choices," lifted global growth for 2026 to 3.1% from 3.0% in July and held 2027 at 3.4%. But that forecast assumed oil near $96 a barrel. Oil is now about $20 above that assumption. If it stays there, the IMF's inflation outlook of 4.7% globally starts to look optimistic, and its growth upgrade starts to look fragile. Forecasts built on $96 oil do not survive $115 oil unchanged.
The US-China framework: a truce, not a peace treaty
Over the weekend in Kuala Lumpur, on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met China's Vice Premier He Lifeng and trade negotiator Li Chenggang for their fifth round of in-person talks since May. What emerged, in Bessent's words, was "a very successful framework for the leaders to discuss." President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping are due to meet on Thursday on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Gyeongju, South Korea, to decide on the terms. China, notably, has not yet confirmed the meeting.
What the framework reportedly contains matters more than the word "framework." According to Bessent, it removes the threat of 100% US tariffs on Chinese goods that had been due to start on November 1, in retaliation for China's expanded export controls on rare earth magnets and minerals. China is expected to delay its rare earths licensing regime by a year while the policy is reconsidered. The existing tariff truce, due to expire on November 10, would be extended. And China would resume substantial purchases of US soybeans, after buying none in September and favouring Brazil and Argentina instead. Bessent told ABC's "This Week" that US soybean farmers "will feel very good" once the terms are announced.
Trump struck a similar tone, saying "I think we're going to have a deal with China," and floating later meetings in China and the United States. On the same Asia trip, his administration also announced trade agreements with four ASEAN nations, setting tariffs of 19% on goods from Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia and 20% on Vietnam, with rare earth exports not blocked.
It is worth being precise about what this is not. It is not a signed trade deal. It is not a rollback of every tariff or export control. And it does not lower the price of oil, which is the Fed's most immediate problem. What it does is remove a cliff edge: the November 1 tariff threat and the November 10 truce expiry. Markets reacted cautiously rather than euphorically — Asian indexes swung between gains and losses, and China's Shanghai Composite slipped from a ten-year high — because traders have seen frameworks before. The difference this time is the calendar: a Thursday leaders' meeting gives the framework a deadline, and deadlines are what turn frameworks into deals or expose them as theatre.
What markets are already telling us
Start with bonds. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury slipped below 5.00% on Thursday for the first time in about a month, then closed Friday right at that threshold. As recently as October 5, it had peaked around 5.34%, the highest in more than two decades. Falling bond yields usually mean investors expect slower growth or are seeking safety. Here they mean both: money leaving stocks and AI-linked shares, and moving into government debt.
Stocks tell the same story from the other side. Asian markets opened Monday mixed to lower, with the MSCI Asia Pacific index slipping 0.2% and South Korea's Kospi down. Gold futures eased 0.30% on Monday, after gold had already fallen to about $4,016 on Friday, and silver slipped 0.39%. Bitcoin, which this blog covered last week as it fought to hold $80,000, was still trading near that level, with analysts describing $78,000 to $80,000 as the key demand zone and $81,500 to $82,000 as the first sign of stabilisation. None of these markets is panicking. All of them are cautious, and caution is expensive: it raises borrowing costs for companies, cools hiring, and makes every central-bank word carry more weight than it should.
Then there is the earnings test. Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon all report this week, and Asia is entering its busiest reporting period, with about 550 of the 1,200 companies in the MSCI Asia Pacific Index due to publish results, according to Bloomberg data cited in market coverage. If those results are strong, they support the argument that the AI investment boom still has earnings behind it. If they disappoint, they reinforce the sell-off in AI-linked shares that has already dragged regional benchmarks down more than 6% this month. The Fed meets in the middle of that test, not after it.
My read: three things that actually matter this week
First, sequencing is the Fed's real problem. A hold on Wednesday paired with a signal that December is live is not the same as a hold that means "we are done." The September projections already pointed to at least one more increase by the end of 2026, and most futures pricing still leans toward at least one more rise by the December 8–9 meeting, though estimates of the odds vary widely. The Fed is effectively betting that oil fades before December. If oil is still near $115 when the December meeting arrives, that bet fails, and the Fed will have to choose between hiking into a weak jobs market or letting inflation run. Neither choice is good. The market's calm about Wednesday is really a bet about December, and December is where the disagreement lives.
Second, the trade framework helps sentiment more than it helps inflation. Soybean purchases help American farmers and Chinese food supply. A one-year delay to rare earth controls helps electronics and car manufacturers plan. Neither puts petrol in a tank. The Fed's inflation problem this autumn is an energy problem, and trade diplomacy, however welcome, does not drill oil wells or reopen shipping lanes. Treating the Kuala Lumpur framework as an inflation fix would be a category error. Its real value is different: it lowers the odds of a second shock — a tariff shock — landing on top of the energy shock the world already has.
Third, the biggest risk this week may be how little surprise markets are prepared for. When nine traders in ten expect the same outcome, the tenth trader's view does all the damage. A surprise quarter-point rise on Wednesday would not just move rates; it would force a repricing of everything from mortgages to emerging-market debt in a single afternoon. A surprisingly dovish statement — one that ruled out December entirely — would do the opposite, and could reignite the very asset rallies the Fed has been trying to cool. The most likely outcome is the least dramatic one, and that is precisely why the statement's wording about December, about oil, and about the labour market will be parsed more carefully than the decision itself.
What it means for ordinary borrowers, savers and small sellers
For borrowers, a hold means no immediate relief and no immediate new pain: mortgage and loan rates in most countries move with local central banks and bond markets, not directly with the Fed, but the Fed sets the tone for global borrowing costs. A December rise, if it comes, would filter through over months, not days. For savers, higher-for-longer rates are good news for deposit returns and bad news for anyone holding long-dated bonds, whose prices fall as yields rise.
For small businesses and online sellers, the transmission is more direct and less forgiving. Fuel surcharges rise with diesel prices, shipping carriers reprice weekly against fuel indexes, and customers facing higher petrol and food bills spend less on discretionary goods. A seller who absorbs a fuel surcharge this week is making the same bet the Fed is making: that the spike fades. A seller who passes it on risks losing the order. There is no painless version of $115 oil for a small business. There is only the choice of who carries the cost, and for how long.
For investors, the honest advice is boring and therefore useful: this is a week for position sizes, not predictions. A single Fed statement, a single Thursday meeting in South Korea, and a single round of mega-cap earnings can each move markets by more than a month of careful analysis. Anyone who tells you they know which way all three will break is selling something.
Three scenarios for Wednesday and beyond
Scenario one — the orderly hold (most likely). The Fed holds at 3.75% to 4.00%, notes elevated inflation and softer hiring, and keeps December open without committing. Markets breathe out, oil stays the swing factor, and attention shifts to Thursday's Trump-Xi meeting and the earnings reports. This is the outcome markets have priced, which is why it would move prices the least.
Scenario two — the hawkish surprise. The Fed raises by a quarter point, citing September's 3.7% inflation and $115 oil. Stocks and crypto fall, the dollar rises, bond yields jump, and December expectations harden further. The Fed would be signalling that it fears inflation becoming entrenched more than it fears a jobs slowdown. It would be a brave decision, and an unpopular one with anyone holding a mortgage.
Scenario three — the dovish shock (least likely). The Fed holds and signals that the hiking cycle is over, pointing to weak payrolls and core inflation of 2.6%. Risk assets rally, the dollar falls, and oil's inflationary signal is treated as temporary. This would comfort borrowers and worry anyone who remembers how quickly energy shocks spread into broader prices in the past.
Frequently asked questions
When exactly does the Fed announce its decision?
The Federal Open Market Committee meets October 27–28, 2026, and announces its decision at 2 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 28. The statement is followed by close scrutiny of the vote, the language on inflation and employment, and any press remarks by Chair Kevin Warsh.
What are interest rates now in the United States?
The federal funds target range is 3.75% to 4.00%, set at the September 15–16 meeting. That was the first increase since 2023, and most policymakers projected at least one further increase by the end of 2026.
Why does the price of oil matter to interest rates?
Oil feeds directly into petrol, transport, food and manufacturing costs, so a jump in crude pushes headline inflation higher. At the same time, expensive fuel acts like a tax on households and businesses, slowing spending. Central banks must judge whether the inflation effect or the slowdown effect matters more, and that judgment is harder when both are happening at once.
What did the US and China actually agree in Kuala Lumpur?
Officials agreed a framework, not a final signed deal. According to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, it removes the threat of 100% US tariffs due November 1, expects China to delay its rare earths licensing regime by a year, extends the tariff truce beyond November 10, and revives Chinese purchases of US soybeans. Presidents Trump and Xi are due to discuss it on Thursday in South Korea, and China has not yet confirmed that meeting.
Will the Fed raise rates again in December?
Most futures pricing still leans toward at least one more increase by the December 8–9 meeting, but estimates vary widely and depend heavily on whether oil stays near $115 and on the next inflation report, due November 10. Wednesday's statement will be read mainly for clues about that December decision.
What should small businesses do about $115 oil?
Review fuel surcharges and shipping terms now rather than after the next carrier repricing, check whether suppliers allow price adjustments, and avoid locking in long fixed-price delivery promises while fuel costs are volatile. Treat the spike as a cost to manage week by week, not as a permanent new price, until it has lasted long enough to prove otherwise.
The bottom line
Wednesday's decision will probably be a hold, and that is the least interesting thing about this week. What matters is what the hold is paired with: a statement that keeps December alive, a Thursday meeting that decides whether the US-China framework becomes a deal, and earnings reports that decide whether the AI boom still earns its valuation. Oil at $115 has already changed the facts on the ground. The question for the Fed, for two presidents and for every market in between is whether it changes the facts for long enough to matter.
Watch three things in order: the Fed's words on Wednesday, the Trump-Xi outcome on Thursday, and the next US inflation report on November 10. If oil fades and the framework holds, this week will be remembered as a scare. If oil stays high and either the framework or the earnings disappoint, it will be remembered as the week the easy part of 2026 ended.
For more on global markets, trade and the economy, visit abdulrahimmughal.com.