Update (30 October 2026): DoorDash and Instacart signed the deal on 29 October 2026 — $65 per share, about $17 billion, a 26% premium to the 22 October close.
Photo: Pexels
On Monday, October 26, the Wall Street Journal reported that DoorDash is in advanced talks to buy Instacart, the grocery delivery company, in a deal that could value Instacart at around $17 billion. Reuters, citing a source familiar with the matter, reported the same day that a deal could be finalised as soon as Wednesday — while stressing that there is no guarantee the talks will produce an agreement at all.
That last clause matters more than the headline number. This is not a done deal. It is a leak about a negotiation, and negotiations at this stage fall apart regularly. But the fact that the talks got this far tells us something real about where online delivery is heading: the restaurant app and the grocery app are no longer separate businesses, and the companies that run them know it.
This article explains what is actually on the table, why DoorDash wants Instacart, why Instacart would sell now, and what a combined company would mean for the people who use these platforms every day — shoppers, restaurants, grocers, couriers, and small sellers who depend on delivery to reach customers.
What was reported, exactly
The Journal's report, by Heather Haddon, said DoorDash is in advanced talks to acquire Instacart, that a deal could be finalised as soon as this week, and that it could value Instacart at around $17 billion. Reuters added that Instacart's talks with Uber are no longer active, and that Instacart had also held preliminary discussions with potential buyers that The Information first reported on Friday.
The market reaction on Monday was immediate and revealing. Instacart shares rose roughly 8 percent in regular trading. DoorDash shares fell around 6 percent. Instacart had a market value of about $13 billion at Friday's close, according to Reuters, while DoorDash's market value is around $73 billion, according to the Journal. In other words, investors priced in a premium for Instacart's shareholders — and a bill for DoorDash's.
Neither company has confirmed the talks publicly. Instacart declined to comment to Reuters. DoorDash and Uber did not immediately respond. Until one of the companies files something or announces something, every detail here should be read as "reported," not confirmed.
Two companies that used to do different jobs
DoorDash began as a restaurant delivery company. It built its name moving meals from restaurants to homes, and it still dominates that space. Over the past few years it has pushed hard into everything else: groceries from Kroger, Safeway and Aldi, and retail goods from Macy's, CVS and Target. It is also, according to the Journal, exploring delivery through drones and ordering through texts to chatbots.
Instacart went the other way. Its core business is online grocery shopping: a customer orders from a retailer, a shopper picks the items, and the order arrives at the door. It went public in 2023, and it has spent the years since building retailer relationships and the unglamorous infrastructure behind grocery delivery — store catalogues, substitution rules for out-of-stock items, and timed pickup and delivery slots that have to work around real store inventory.
That difference is the whole point of the deal. DoorDash has the delivery network and the customer base. Instacart has the grocery marketplace and the retailer relationships. Put together, you get a company that can plausibly deliver anything a household needs — dinner tonight, groceries tomorrow morning, and a pharmacy order in between — from one app, with one membership, on one logistics network.
Why DoorDash wants Instacart now
The first reason is the simplest: grocery is where the growth is, and DoorDash is still a challenger there. Card-spending data from Consumer Edge, cited in coverage of the talks, shows DoorDash's share of US restaurant, grocery and retail delivery spending rising from about 44 percent in the second quarter of 2021 to nearly 59 percent in the third quarter of 2026. Instacart's share fell from about 26 percent to 18 percent over the same period.
Read those two numbers together and the story is not "DoorDash is winning and Instacart is losing." It is "DoorDash has been eating into grocery and retail categories that used to belong to Instacart." Michael Gunther, senior vice president of research and market intelligence at Consumer Edge, put it plainly: "The boundaries between restaurant, grocery and broader retail delivery have become increasingly blurred."
Buying Instacart would let DoorDash stop competing for grocery share store by store and instead own the grocery platform outright — its retailer contracts, its shopper network, and its catalogue data. It is faster than building the same thing, and in delivery, speed matters because the customer habit forms once: whichever app a household opens first for groceries tends to be the app it keeps opening.
The second reason is competition from companies much bigger than either of them. Walmart and Amazon have both become formidable delivery challengers since Instacart last explored a sale in 2021, when its shares traded at a significantly higher price, according to the Journal. Walmart can deliver from its own stores, with its own staff, at a scale no marketplace can match. Amazon has Prime, its own logistics network, and a grocery business of its own. A combined DoorDash–Instacart is, in part, an answer to that: the only independent delivery company big enough to stand next to them.
The third reason is cost. Delivery is a business of thin margins and heavy fixed costs — driver pay, insurance, technology, and customer support. Reuters notes the industry has been grappling with rising labour costs and tighter regulation of delivery workers since the pandemic-era ordering boom faded. Running one network instead of two, with one set of systems, is the classic way to spread those costs over more orders.
Why Instacart would sell
Instacart is not a failing company. Its share fell, but 18 percent of a large and growing delivery market is still a large business. The case for selling is about position, not survival.
First, the strategic window. DoorDash is the natural buyer — Nick Smith, co-founder of growth strategy consultancy Manifesto Growth Architects, told Reuters that DoorDash "looks like the more natural fit for Instacart, given the complementary strengths of its restaurant delivery network and Instacart's grocery expertise." If Instacart wants a premium price, it gets it from a buyer that actually needs what it has. Uber, the other obvious buyer, is no longer in active talks.
Second, the competitive squeeze. Instacart's core advantage — being the neutral grocery marketplace that every retailer could use — gets harder to defend when the biggest retailers build their own delivery and when DoorDash signs the same grocers directly. Selling into a larger platform converts that slowly eroding advantage into cash for shareholders now, rather than defending it store by store for years.
Third, the price. Around $17 billion against a $13 billion Friday market value is a 26% premium. For a public company's board, that is the kind of offer that is hard to ignore, especially when the alternative is years of grinding competition against Walmart, Amazon, DoorDash and Uber at the same time.
What it would mean for shoppers
In the short term, probably very little. Deals like this take months to close and longer to integrate, and both apps would almost certainly keep running separately at first. Nobody's account is about to disappear overnight, and nobody should change their shopping habits on the basis of a leak.
In the medium term, the effects cut both ways. On the plus side, a combined company could offer one membership covering restaurants, groceries and retail, wider store coverage in areas where only one of the two currently operates, and better delivery windows because one network can pool couriers and shoppers across order types. A courier already heading to a neighbourhood with a grocery order can pick up a restaurant order on the same run — that is the efficiency gain the whole deal is built on.
On the minus side, less competition usually means less pressure on fees. Delivery platforms compete on delivery fees, service fees, membership prices and promotions. Remove one independent competitor and the remaining company has less reason to keep those low — especially in towns where Walmart or Amazon delivery is weak and the combined company would be the only serious option. Shoppers should watch the fee line on their receipts, not the press releases, in the year after any deal closes.
What it would mean for restaurants, grocers and small sellers
For restaurants, the deal is mostly good news in the short term and a warning in the long term. A bigger DoorDash means more customers reachable through one platform and, potentially, bundled deals that pair a restaurant order with a grocery order. But it also means more dependence on a single gatekeeper. Restaurants already pay commission on every marketplace order; when the marketplace gets bigger, its bargaining power grows, and the restaurant's shrinks. The smart response has not changed: use the platforms for discovery, but keep your own direct ordering channel alive so you are never entirely at one company's mercy.
For grocers, the calculation is sharper. Many grocers joined Instacart precisely because it was independent — a way to offer delivery without handing their customer relationship to a rival. If Instacart becomes part of DoorDash, those grocers have to decide whether they are comfortable with their delivery partner also being the company that sells their competitors' products and controls the customer data. Some will stay. Some will accelerate their own delivery operations. Expect a wave of renegotiated contracts either way.
For small online sellers, the lesson is broader and worth stating plainly: every platform you sell through can change its rules, its fees or its owner. The sellers who survive platform shake-ups are the ones who own their customer list — an email list, a repeat-order base, a brand people search for by name — rather than renting all of their demand from one app. A $17 billion deal is a reminder that the ground under a platform business can move fast, and without warning.
What it would mean for couriers and shoppers
Delivery workers sit on both sides of this deal. DoorDash uses couriers; Instacart uses shoppers who pick items in stores as well as delivering them. A combined company could offer more work in one place — a shopper could pick a grocery order and a courier could deliver it, with fewer gaps between jobs. That is the optimistic version, and it is genuinely plausible in dense cities.
The pessimistic version is also plausible: one employer, or one platform setting the terms, means less ability to play two platforms against each other for better pay or better batches. Gig workers have always used multi-apping — running two apps at once and taking the better offer — as their main bargaining tool. Consolidation weakens that tool. Regulators and labour groups will be watching this closely, and workers should be too: pay rates per order, not company statements about opportunity, are the number to track.
The obstacles: regulators, retailers and the deal itself
Three things could still stop or reshape this deal. The first is antitrust. A combined DoorDash–Instacart would be the largest independent delivery platform in the US, and regulators in Washington have spent the past few years looking hard at mergers that reduce competition in markets consumers use daily. The companies would argue that Walmart and Amazon are the real competition; regulators may answer that grocery delivery is its own market and that removing Instacart as an independent rival matters regardless. Expect a long review if a deal is announced.
The second is the retailers. Instacart's value is its retailer relationships, and those relationships are contracts, not property. If major grocers use a change of ownership to renegotiate or walk away, part of what DoorDash is paying for walks out of the door with them. Due diligence on this point — which contracts survive, which can be terminated — will be central to whether the price holds.
The third is the simplest: the deal may not happen. The Journal and Reuters both stress that the talks could fall apart. A price disagreement, a board objection, or a leak that hardens positions can all kill a negotiation that looked advanced on Monday. Until there is a signed agreement, the correct way to describe this is "reported talks," and anyone writing about it as a certainty is getting ahead of the facts.
Three ways this could play out
Scenario one: the deal closes, roughly as reported. DoorDash pays around $17 billion, both apps keep running, integration happens gradually, and within two years there is effectively one delivery membership covering food, groceries and retail. Fees creep up in weaker markets; coverage improves in smaller towns. This is the base case the market priced in on Monday.
Scenario two: the deal collapses or gets blocked. Instacart stays independent, DoorDash keeps building grocery store by store, and the share trends from Consumer Edge continue — DoorDash rising, Instacart drifting down, Walmart and Amazon gaining in the background. Instacart's shares would likely give back most of Monday's 8 percent gain.
Scenario three: a different buyer or a different structure emerges. Uber's talks are inactive, but that can change, and a private equity buyer or a retailer could still enter. A partnership or minority investment is also possible — less dramatic than a takeover, but enough to give Instacart capital and DoorDash a grocery foothold without a full merger review. Do not rule this out just because the current leak names one buyer.
What to watch next
Five things will tell you where this is going. First, any announcement — or silence — by Wednesday, the earliest date Reuters' source gave for a possible finalisation. Second, the share prices: if Instacart's gain holds, the market believes a deal is coming; if it fades, belief is fading. Third, statements from major grocers, whose reaction will shape the regulatory and commercial case. Fourth, any sign of regulatory interest from Washington, which would set the timetable. And fifth, DoorDash's own next earnings report, where management will have to address the leak whether it wants to or not.
For shoppers and sellers, the practical advice is boring and therefore useful: change nothing yet. Keep your accounts, keep your alternatives, and watch the fee lines. Platform deals are announced in headlines and felt in receipts, and the receipts take months to arrive.
Frequently asked questions
Has DoorDash bought Instacart?
No. As of October 27, 2026, the Wall Street Journal and Reuters have reported advanced talks about a deal valued at around $17 billion, possibly finalised as soon as this week. Neither company has confirmed the talks, and both reports stress there is no guarantee an agreement will be reached.
How much would the deal be worth?
Around $17 billion, according to the reported talks. That compares with Instacart's market value of about $13 billion at Friday's close, which implies a 26% premium for Instacart shareholders if the reported price holds.
Would the Instacart app disappear?
Almost certainly not immediately. In deals like this, both apps normally keep running separately for months while the companies integrate systems behind the scenes. Any eventual merger of the apps would be announced well in advance, and users would be migrated gradually, not switched off overnight.
Why does DoorDash want a grocery company?
Because the line between restaurant delivery, grocery delivery and retail delivery has blurred. DoorDash already delivers groceries from Kroger, Safeway and Aldi, but Instacart owns the grocery marketplace itself — the retailer relationships, the shopper network and the store catalogue data. Buying it is faster than building the same position store by store.
What does this mean for delivery fees?
Nothing immediately, and possibly higher fees later in markets with little competition. Less competition usually reduces pressure on fees, but a bigger network can also be more efficient, which can hold fees down. The honest answer is that it depends on the market — which is why shoppers should watch their own receipts rather than trusting either side's promises.
Could regulators block the deal?
Yes, or they could impose conditions. A combined company would be the largest independent delivery platform in the US, and regulators would examine whether removing Instacart as an independent rival harms competition, even with Walmart and Amazon in the market. A review, if a deal is announced, would likely take many months.
The bottom line
The DoorDash–Instacart talks are not really about two apps. They are about what delivery has become: not a restaurant service or a grocery service, but a single logistics network for everything a household buys, fought over by a handful of very large companies. DoorDash wants to be the independent champion of that network. Instacart, which built the grocery half of it, has to decide whether its future is brighter inside that champion or outside it.
For everyone else — shoppers, restaurants, grocers, couriers and small sellers — the deal is a reminder to pay attention to structure, not just headlines. Who owns the platform you depend on determines what you pay, what you earn, and how much choice you have. That was true before Monday's leak, and it will still be true whatever happens by Wednesday.
For more on online business and the platforms that shape it, visit abdulrahimmughal.com.
Sources
- Reuters, "DoorDash strikes $17 billion deal for US rival Instacart, bets on grocery delivery" (29 October 2026) — reuters.com
- Bloomberg, "DoorDash to Buy Instacart in $17 Billion Deal" (29 October 2026) — bloomberg.com
- DoorDash, "DoorDash to Acquire Instacart to Help Local Stores Win" (29 October 2026) — ir.doordash.com